Development of a Rat Model of Mechanically Induced Tunable Pain and Associated Temporomandibular Joint Responses.

PURPOSE Although mechanical overloading of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is implicated in TMJ osteoarthritis (OA) and orofacial pain, most experimental models of TMJ-OA induce only acute and resolving pain, which do not meaningfully simulate the pathomechanisms of TMJ-OA in patients with chronic pain. The aim of this study was to adapt an existing rat model of mechanically induced TMJ-OA, to induce persistent orofacial pain by altering only the jaw-opening force, and to measure the expression of common proxies of TMJ-OA, including degradation and inflammatory proteins, in the joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS TMJ-OA was mechanically induced in a randomized, prospective study using 2 magnitudes of opening loads in separate groups (ie.,. 2-N, 3.5-N and sham control [no load]). Steady mouth opening was imposed daily (60 minutes/day for 7 days) in female Holtzman rats, followed by 7 days of rest, and orofacial sensitivity was measured throughout the loading and rest periods. Joint structure and extent of degeneration were assessed at day 14 and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13), hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in articular cartilage was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and quantitative densitometry methods at day 7 between the 2 loading and control groups. Statistical differences of orofacial sensitivity and chondrocyte expression between loading groups were computed and significance was set at a P value less than .05. RESULTS Head-withdrawal thresholds for the 2 loading groups were significantly decreased during loading (P < .0001), but that decrease remained through day 14 only for the 3.5-N group (P < .00001). At day 14, TMJs from the 2-N and 3.5-N groups exhibited truncation of the condylar cartilage, typical of TMJ-OA. In addition, a 3.5-N loading force significantly upregulated MMP-13 (P < .0074), with nearly a 2-fold increase in HIF-1α (P < .001) and TNF-α (P < .0001) at day 7, in 3.5-N loaded joints over those loaded by 2 N. CONCLUSION Unlike a 2-N loading force, mechanical overloading of the TMJ using a 3.5-N loading force induced constant and nonresolving pain and the upregulation of inflammatory markers only in the 3.5-N group, suggesting that these markers could predict the maintenance of persistent orofacial pain. As such, the development of a tunable experimental TMJ-OA model that can separately induce acute or persistent orofacial pain using similar approaches provides a platform to better understand the pathomechanisms involved and possibly to evaluate potential treatment strategies for patients with painful TMJ-OA.